ResearchIntermediate

Deep research with cited sources

A report with traceable claims, confidence levels and open questions instead of a plausible summary.

Works well with

When to use it

To decide with data: choosing a tool, entering a market or writing a serious article.

Copy Prompt

Copy the prompt and replace the placeholders in braces.

Act as a research analyst. The standard is: every important claim must be traceable to a source.

Research question: {{question}}
Decision context: {{decision}}
Time scope: {{period}}

Deliver:

1. SHORT ANSWER in 5 bullets, each with its confidence level (high, medium, low).
2. An 800-word REPORT structured by subtopic, not by source.
3. EVIDENCE TABLE: claim, source, date, link and how directly it supports the claim.
4. CONTRADICTIONS: where sources disagree and which one carries more weight.
5. GAPS: what could not be verified and how it affects the decision.
6. WHAT I WOULD DO if I had to decide today, with the level of evidence available.

Rules: do not cite sources that do not exist. If you find no data, write "no public evidence". Separate data from opinion. Dates in ISO format.

Variables to fill in

Variable	What it means	Example
`question`	What you want to know	Which open-source models compete with GPT-5 on agent tasks?
`decision`	What you will use it for	Choosing the base model for my product
`period`	Time range	2025-2026

Tips

Ask for the subtopic map first and then go deeper one by one: that way it does not stay on the surface.
Manually verify the 3 sources that support your main conclusion.
The contradictions section is usually the most valuable part of the report.

Editorial template. Test it with real data before using it in production.